Search This Blog

Tuesday, June 19, 2012

Global Climate Change: Underestimated Impact of Sea Level Rise on Habitat Loss?

Jun 14, 2012
The hidden impact of sea-level rise: current projections may be underestimating the consequences of global climate change on habitat loss.

Global climate change is expected to cause sea-level rise of approximately 1-2 meters within this century and studies are beginning to project the consequences for humans and global biodiversity. While the direct consequences of sea-level rise due to flooding and inundation ('primary effects') are beginning to be assessed, no studies have yet considered the possible secondary effects from sea-level rise due to the relocation of human refugees into the hinterland.

Researchers from the Konrad Lorenz Institute of Ethology of the University of Veterinary Medicine, Vienna, with lead author Florian Wetzel and senior researcher Dustin Penn, collaborated with scientists from the Ecoinformatics and Biodiversity Group of Aarhus University, Denmark to assess and project the potential secondary impacts of sea-level rise on habitat availability and the distribution of mammals. They found that in more populated regions secondary effects can lead to an equal or even higher loss of habitat than primary displacement effects.

The results are published in the new issue of the international journal Global Change Biology.
Read More.... 

Get Response: Click HERE

CRC to discuss sea-level rise, land use

Published: Monday, June 18, 2012 at 12:19 p.m.
Last Modified: Monday, June 18, 2012 at 12:19 p.m.
The N.C. Coastal Resources Commission will meet in Beaufort Wednesday and Thursday to discuss sea-level rise and changes to several land-use plans.

The 15-member commission, which oversees development in the state's 20 coastal counties, will meet at the NOAA/NCNERR Administration Building, 101 Pivers Island Road, Beaufort, beginning at 1 p.m. Wednesday.

The CRC will hear a review of its draft sea-level rise policy, which contains no specific sea-level rise benchmark and, among other things, encourages coastal communities to examine scientific data from their region to devise an appropriate response to the threat.

At the commission's February meeting in Nags Head, members voted to return the policy to committee rather than approve the document and forward it to public hearing.

A spokeswoman for the state Department of Environment and Natural Resources said it's unclear whether the commission will vote on the document following Wednesday's presentation.

The policy is separate from a sea-level rise report, which originally recommended that coastal communities prepare for 1 meter – or 39 inches – of sea-level rise by 2100.

That prediction drew significant ire from developers and sparked a General Assembly debate that attracted national attention, culminating in last week's passage of a controversial sea-level rise bill that would prohibit state agencies from using projections of accelerated sea-level rise – mainly from global warming and the melting of polar ice caps – in drafting coastal development rules.

CRC members will also consider amendments to several land-use plans, including one for New Hanover County and one for Topsail Beach.

Kate Elizabeth Queram: (910) 343-2217

On Twitter: @kate_goes_bleu

Get Response: Click HERE

Sea-level rise issue may be headed for moratorium, further study


State lawmakers may try to place a moratorium on using predictions of accelerated sea-level rise in coastal planning while the state studies the issue in the coming years.

Rep. Pat McElraft, R-Carteret, on Tuesday discussed a plan to address the contentious sea-level-rise issue this year and beyond. The House, she said, could take up the sea-level-rise bill this week and vote not to accept the measure as it recently passed the Senate.

If the House votes not to concur with the Senate version, it would put the issue in front of a conference committee of House and Senate members. There, McElraft said, the plan is to place a moratorium on using accelerated rates of sea-level rise in writing coastal development policies while the state studies the issue.
McElraft said a study, which would be conducted at least in part by the Coastal Resources Commission, should look at all of the available science on the issue, “not just one model like the Science Panel looked at.”
McElraft added that a study could take as long as five years to complete, meaning the moratorium would be in place for some time.

“We need to look at this more scientifically and not with a political agenda,” McElraft said.
As it passed the Senate, the bill would prohibit state agencies from using projections of accelerated sea-level rise – mainly from global warming and the melting of polar ice caps – in drafting coastal development rules. Instead they would have to use only historical sea-level-rise data. The historic rates of rise are much lower than many scientists believe the seas will rise in the future.

The bill was a direct response to a 2010 report of the Coastal Resources Commission’s Science Panel on Coastal Hazards. The report recommended that a sea-level rise of 39 inches, or 1 meter, be adopted as the amount of anticipated rise by the year 2100 for policy development and planning purposes. The report noted that there is consensus among scientists that the rate of rise will increase this century and beyond.
But that report has been criticized by some along the coast who say planning for such a dramatic rise in sea levels could have a significant economic impact on eastern North Carolina because homes and roads and other infrastructure would have to be built farther from the ocean or higher off the ground. They also say enacting policies based on 1 meter of rise could lead to higher insurance rates and restrictions on land use along the coast.

Sen. David Rouzer, R-Johnston, who ushered the measure through the Senate, said Tuesday afternoon that he may not support McElraft’s idea.
“At first blush, probably not,” Rouzer said. “I think this bill’s a good bill, so we’ll see,” he said.
Any changes made by the conference committee would have to be approved by the full House and Senate.

Get Response: Click HERE


Work Your Abs Without Getting On The Floor

Monday, June 18, 2012

The Moon's Peculiar Dust Gets More Peculiar Still

Story taken from:

The moon has never had all that much. It doesn't have atmosphere, it doesn't have water and it sure doesn't have life. What it does have though is dirt -- lots and lots of dirt -- and it's some of the coolest stuff you ever saw. Now it's gotten cooler still, thanks to the discovery this week of a wholly unexpected ingredient stirred into the lunar mix.
Even before astronauts landed on the moon, they knew the soil would be something special. With no atmosphere to intercept incoming meteorites and micrometeorites, the lunar regolith -- or surface covering -- would have been subjected to a 4.5 billion year bombardment that would have produced a layer of dust far finer than confectioner's sugar. That dust, the Apollo crewmen found when they went out to play in it, did some strange things: it rose above the surface when disturbed and hung there far longer than could be explained by the moon's weak gravity; it crept deep into the weave and cracks of virtually anything it touched and clung there as if adhesively attached. What's more, it was filled with exquisitely fine green and orange glass beads -- the products of the superheated melting and cooling that followed impacts.

(PHOTOS: 'Ring of Fire' Solar Eclipse Dazzles Spectators Around the Earth)
When the astronauts brought their samples home, the geologists in Houston discovered even more. The soil was unusually chemically reactive -- not something that was expected from a scrap of a world that was supposed to be largely inert. And it did a lousy job of conducting heat. The surface of the moon on the sunlit side might be close to the boiling point of water, but just a few feet down it would be far below freezing.
For 40 years, geologists struggled to understand just what gave lunar soil these pixie dust properties, but geologist Marek Zbik of Queensland University of Technology in Brisbane, Australia may finally have cracked it. The answer: nanoparticles -- vanishingly tiny flecks of mass, some no bigger than molecules, that have all the odd qualities of moon dust, and more.
Zbik made his discovery thanks to an instrument known as a synchrotron-based nano tomograph -- a hunk of hardware that didn't remotely exist when the Apollo crews splashed down. Nano tomographs work by bombarding nano particles with x-rays to produce 3-D images of structures that otherwise would be far too tiny to see -- or at least to see well. When Zbik got some lunar soil and a nano tomograph in the same room together, he knew that the first thing he wanted to look at were the infinitesimal glass bubbles scattered through the lunar material.
(SPECIAL: The 40th Anniversary of the Moon Landing)
The bubbles are formed the same way the larger glass beads are formed -- in the fiery heat of meteorite collisions -- but their exotic origins notwithstanding, they still ought to be built like any other bubble. That means they ought to be filled with some kind of gas. That, however, wasn't the case. "Instead of gas or vapor," says Zbik, "the lunar bubbles were filled with a highly porous network of alien-looking glassy particles that span the bubbles' interior."

Alien-looking maybe, but Zbik quickly recognized them as nano particles -- and that would explain a lot. Nano particles can become electro-statically charged, which would impart the same property to the soil, perfectly accounting for its tendency to float. They have low thermal conductivity, explaining why the lunar subsoil can get so cold so close to the surface. They are chemically active, and they are also electrically sticky, meaning that when the soil got on an astronaut's pressure suit or into the joints of his lunar tools it would be all but impossible to brush away.

What was not immediately evident was why the nano particles had a chance to interact with the soil at all. The ones that were spotted by the tomograph, after all, were sealed inside the bubbles like a figurine in a snow globe. Something would have to be breaking those globes, and Zbik reckons it was the same thing that created them in the first place: collisions.

(MORE: Lunar Liquid: More Water than Ever Found on the Surface of the Moon)
"It appears that the nano particles are formed inside bubbles of molten rocks when meteorites hit the lunar surface," he says. "Then they are released when the glass bubbles are pulverized by the consequent bombardment of [more] meteorites. This continuous pulverizing ... and constant mixing develop a type of soil which is unknown on Earth."

There's more than just abstruse soil science in all this. Nano particles have long been the it material for engineers working on new computer hardware, medical equipment, drug-delivery systems, even fabric. The better we understand their origins and properties, the better we can manipulate them. What's more, if we ever hope to establish a long-term human presence on the moon, the tendency of the soil to cling to surfaces and, ultimately, to wear them away is a problem that will have to be addressed. Studying the dust now can provide solutions for later.

That, however, is for another time. For now it's enough just to appreciate the elegance of both the new discovery and the moon itself. Four decades after we last dropped by for a visit, our little satellite is still surprising us.

LIST: Top 10 Things You Didn't Know About The Moon
SPECIAL: The Moon Race
View this article on Time.com
Most Popular on Time.com:

Wednesday, June 13, 2012

Kington Life Plasma in Sinar Harian

(If you can't view the images and message below, please click here.)

Visit all Elken's other brands:


Get Response: Click HERE
Elken Sdn Bhd
20, Jalan 1/137C, Batu 5,
Jalan Kelang Lama
Kuala Lumpur, Kuala Lumpur 58000
MY
Read the VerticalResponse marketing policy.
Try Email Marketing with VerticalResponse!

EL MARINO - SEE IT TO BELIEVE IT!!

Visit all Elken's other brands:

Get Response: Click HERE

Joke: Dreams of animals!!!!!!!!!




Animal always refer to our best friends or pets. But all this will change someday if human have no respect to them.

This we'll get if we one of the crucial human........
*
*
*
*



FunAndFunOnly (www.mails4u.net.tc) - SridhaR
.......
.......
.......





FunAndFunOnly (www.mails4u.net.tc) - SridhaR
.......
.......
.......





FunAndFunOnly (www.mails4u.net.tc) - SridhaR
.......
.......



And the best of all

.......
.......
........
.......
.......
........
.......
.......
.......
.......
.......
.......
........
........
.......
.......
.......











FunAndFunOnly (www.mails4u.net.tc) - SridhaR

 Get Response: Click HERE